tangerine dream rubycon

Why? Even fourty-year-old manual SLR lenses of this designation still cost substantial amounts of money, because they were expensive back in the days and because 35mm f/1.8 really is attractive, it's where wide-angle and the option to blur backgrounds meet in a really nice way. Even for moving subjects, such as from a balloon, once you have your exposure and focus set, it performs like any other lens. It features an aperture range of F0.95-F16, uses a nine-blade aperture diaphragm, has a 58mm front filter thread and has a minimum focusing distance of 30cm (11.8”). However, if you admit as you did there that there is a benefit to a larger sensor (DR) when the ISO is the same value, and that changing the ISO on the larger sensor to a higher value will eventually balance out said benefit, well congrats: you've just proven equivalent ISO to yourself. I won't :). There are many wide angle lenses out there. Wider lenses tend to be more forgiving when trying to focus them. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. Please try again. $180<$400, and quality 35mm w/AF > Soft MF. Nailing the exposure is a little trickier because you need to be looking through the lens to get the exposure balanced. We've selected our favorite lenses for Sony mirrorlses cameras in several categories to make your decisions easier. light body, the 17mm f/1.8 lens is a portable, on-the-go option for videographers - both handheld and on gimbals. I put MFT base ISO200 and FF ISO800 side by side and I see that they are comparable. Find answers in product info, Q&As, reviews. The Sony ZV-1 was designed specifically for vloggers, but this compact camera is an excellent option for still photographers too. I have the Voigtlander - it is a superb lens, with plenty of character, and the starbursts are to die for. It means that you are shooting slower and have to think way more about your images – no run and gun. I have read that their older 35mm/f0.95 for APS-C was really quite bad, but at least their 25mm/0.95 for M4/3 is a different story. Shutter speed will be faster on the m4/3 for the same rated Iso "setting" and f0.95, as opposed to f1.8 on a FF to get the same brightness, there is no equivalent shutter speed. The Dof is so razor thin that nothing is in focus. It’s harmless enough if people want to do it, but it makes no difference to the image you capture . It`s 400$ and weights 200 grams. or would it be a good picture and the FF trolls can get bent. I'm not against you in any way, I just do what I've been doing since I became interested in FT (and, later. But the Canon file doesn't really seem better here, either. Seems nice and looks great, however manual focussing at 0.95 is not something I’d like to do on a regular basis. Many focus on technical specifications and others focus on sharpness and precision of the optics. "different size formats have different depth of field" - Wrong! Much of what you write is solid, but this really is a bit like "now look here, everyone's a wrong-way driver except me". You're the first and so far only person I've met to state that claim, and I've met tons of BS in the defense of any system available in my way through digital photography forums. "but that doesn’t mean one is better than the other" - Wrong! At $149 USD, the Laowa 17mm f1.8 lens is quite the value. Also, different focal lengths produce inherently different levels of shallowness, so the 50mm lens you cite is no valid comparison to judge the shallowness of a 35mm (or 35mm equivalent) lens by in any case. The physical properties of the lens do not change. The fact that others think about equivalence is not a rule or even necessary. Please, just stop there, while you are correct about something. Equivalent lens provides the same amount of light for the smaller sensor. If you want a camera that you can pick up and use without having to page through the manual first, then this guide is for you. And stopping it down to even f/1.2 helps a fair bit. Top subscription boxes – right to your door, © 1996-2020, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. ... the lens was never functional ... Zeiss Ikon public relations guru Herr Wolf Wehran decided that he wanted to draw attention to his phenomenon by creating a product poking fun at the fast glass fad. Equivalence is about utilizing the same amount of light for reproducing the same images. Beyond around f/1, equivalence falls apart in rather interesting and complex ways. We’ve chosen cameras that can take great photos and make it easy to get great looking video, rather than being the ones you’d choose as a committed videographer. Long-zoom compacts fill the gap between pocketable cameras and interchangeable lens models with expensive lenses, offering a great combination of lens reach and portability. Different formats apply different circles of confusion, which results in different depths of field for identical lenses on different formats. RGKit Play, the first modular wireless motion control kit, has launched on Kickstarter. By standard lens conventions, f-stop is defined in terms of light-gathering ability (so as you open a lens up by a stop, it takes in twice as much light). Equivalent settings would give you the same brightness and same shutter speeds too. I had many people asking me if I was shooting with a film camera when I had this lens on my Pen F. I seemed to reinforce this feeling when I tried to focus and take a photograph and took forever. Only if a lens is also very soft wide open, it gets more difficult again. Looking at the blueprint for the lens, it appears to me that they did not measure the entrance pupil properly (disclaimer: I am not an expert on catadioptric lens measurements). Trying to nail focus with a manual focus lens also means you have to slow down. Flange distance may not be accurate, for focusing to infinity on the barrel and then taking a photo doesn't give me infinity... have to focus just 1-2mm below that marker. Comes with a little lens hood. They also feel pretty plastic. 35mm equivalent isn't great for widefield astrophotography. That's not the case for equivalent focal lengths (e.g. Laowa 17mm f/1.8 MFT is perfect for street, travel and everyday photography. Ok so using a faster shutter speed is not a advantage in low light, All thing's do not have to be equal you use each system to it's advantages, this is the basic problem with comparing formats they don't have to be equal, this is a m4/3 lens, compare it to a slower m4/3 lens for speed and image quality, someone always has to start with the equivalency debate. Before that sensor, a comparison would have looked different. Since the sensor is smaller, it works out to the same as a 35/1.9 on FF. Nikon's new entry-level mirrorless full-framer feels anything but entry-level. Shure you can increase the ISO by 2 stops and lose the benefit of the larger sensor, but those who shoot m4/3 don't care. The diffusion filters come in seven sizes: 37mm, 58mm, 62mm, 67mm, 72mm, 77mm and 82mm, and are offered in two densities — 10% and 20% — to ensure you get exactly the look you want. Some famous photographers have operated with only lenses in this range. Would you use a lens like this? Pictures speak for themselves. Despite the f/1.8 fast aperture, sharp and high-contrast images can be captured at any aperture – even wide open! The lens was given the name 'Super-Q-Gigantar.' Zeiss made it as a joke. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for travel and recommended the best. The EVF in mirrorless cameras also gives a bright enough view when stopped down, to see the actual DOF. Great color with little distortion. But, ignorance and nonsensical beliefs are harmful. Sometimes, though, the "more effort for resolution and correction" is what makes (and, to some extent, justifiably so) some of the better lenses within the MFT lineup even larger and more expensive than identically-specified FF lenses. So “1:2” would be f/2 (and “0:95” would not be a thing). Yes, starting around ISO 1600 Olympus files become problematic. It has a minimum focus distance of 5.9 inches/15cm from the sensor and has a 46mm filter thread. Because magic, and you are a genius ... right? They must have slightly modified it anyway to care for the 4mm glass block on (M)FT sensors, double the thickness of other systems, which needs to go into lens design. We know, we know, you're sick of the webcam news, but Nikon users can now use ten of Nikon's most recent DSLR and mirrorless cameras as webcams on their macOS computers. If you think back to the film days, it wouldn’t be until you got your images developed that you would know you messed up. That said, our conversation ends here (or, rather, there https://www.dpreview.com/news/7094964327/fujifilm-launches-xf-50mm-f1-0-r-wr?comment=7623774968 ). Images have more of a vintage look than the clinical sharpness of many of the auto-focus lenses I've used. LOTS of fun with this lens. 4k is annoying to edit and store, and 1080 is good enough for me. Your recently viewed items and featured recommendations, Select the department you want to search in. So they both need the same 1/50. "never needed to go above base iso" - Which is no better than FF ISO 800. Even "large" aperture lenses are pretty slow. Wish this was APS-C as well, I rather like 17-18mm lenses on APS-C. "[T]he fact that you can't show me" is, point one, not necessarily a fact. Great optics and a great focal length for every day, Reviewed in the United States on March 30, 2020. It's an interesting optical design because it's compact enough and cheap enough one could do sensibly that. When the chance finally arrived, he opted to bring his Panon 120 camera, to make some special memories. Just stating the claim is not enough. Especially for the price. The 'Q' stands for 'Quatsch,' which translates to 'nonsense' in German." A collectable $80,000 gag at this point, but a gag non-the-less. For what it is, though, it's nice, and I'll continue using it often. @Hubertus Bigend. Back in the old manual focus film camera days, you had split prisms and micro prisms in your viewfinder to help you get your focus right. FF is better. There are a lot of gear reviews for new photography gear. Your question may be answered by sellers, manufacturers, or customers who purchased this item, who are all part of the Amazon community. "We don't care" is the ultimate argument, for sure. Only if you don't care for the actual image, the printed or otherwise displayed result, and use multiple standards for same-sized prints from differently-sized sensors, only then you can fíx a circle of confusion independent of sensor size. I am perfectly happy with the camera and lenses I own. Laowa is a true contender in lower cost high quality lenses. It's sort of like buying a gag perpetual motion machine from a NASA gift shop. @George1958: I strongly suggest what I just suggested here https://www.dpreview.com/news/6759423733/zy-optics-unveils-399-17mm-f0-95-speedmaster-lens-for-mft-cameras?comment=2366777473 and here https://www.dpreview.com/news/6759423733/zy-optics-unveils-399-17mm-f0-95-speedmaster-lens-for-mft-cameras?comment=3621886943 – really, in 2020 now people should really know how lenses and formats work... Fun fact, ISO is the key. some MFT users do care about FF equiv. It's F1.9 :). You need faster shutter speed for higher density MFT chips. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness. Equal ISO do not produce comparable results. Things you only realize when you have the lens in your hand or on your camera. Now, "simply the ablility to use a faster shutter speed" – how is that not supposed to be an advantage? The latter is willful ignorance, harmful because it means people - not just the deluded ones but those who listen to them - make the wrong purchasing decisions. 1/60th. Also, if you check the photography reference books, and the DoF calculator, M43 setup produces smaller (shallower) Depth of Field, while larger FF setup produce larger (deeper) Depth of Field. Real photographers always only want, say, a 50mm, so they buy a 50mm, no matter whether they're using a 1/6" camcorder, a Micro Four Thirds mirrorless camera, a medium format Hasselblad or a large format bellows camera, because "focal length is focal length". With no AF? laowa 12 mm f/2.8 Zero-d Sony FE Lens (Wide, MILC/SLR, 16/10, 22 – 2.8, Manual, Son... VILTROX 23mm f/1.4 Auto Focus E-Mount Lens for Sony,Wide Angle Large Aperture APS-C... SMALLRIG Mount Bracket SSD Holder for Samsung T5 SSD with 1/4”-20 Threads, Compatible with SMALLRIG Cage for BMPCC 4K & 6K and Z CAM (New Version) – 2245B, [New Version] SMALLRIG BMPCC 4K & 6K Cage for Blackmagic Design Pocket Cinema Camera 4K & 6K w/Cold Shoe, NATO Rail – 2203, SMALLRIG Cold Shoe Mount Adapter Bracket Hot Shoe with 1/4" Thread for Camera Cage Flash LED Moniter, Pack of 2-2060, Blackmagic Design Pocket Cinema Camera 4K, K&F Concept 46mm Slim HD Multi-Coated Variable Polarizing ND Neutral Density Adjustable ND2 ND4 ND8 to ND400 Lens Filter + Lens Cleaning Cloth for DSLR Cameras, Wasabi Power LP-E6, LP-E6N Battery (2-Pack) and Dual Charger for Canon EOS 5D Mark II/III/IV, EOS 5DS, 5DS R, EOS 6D, 6D Mark II, EOS 7D, 7D Mark II, EOS 60D, 60Da, 70D, 80D, EOS R, EOS R5, XC10, XC15, Laowa VE7520MFTSTBLK 7.5-mm Lens for Micro 4/3 Cameras (16.9 MP, HD 720 P), Black, Meike 35mm F1.4 Large Aperture Manual Focus Prime MFT Lens for Micro Four Thirds M43 Olympus and Panasonic Digital Mirrorless Cameras and BMPCC, Meike 12mm f/2.8 Ultra Wide Angle Manual Fixed Lens with Removeable Hood for MFT Micro Four Thirds Panasonic/Olympus Mirrorless Camera, Rokinon 12mm F2.0 NCS CS Ultra Wide Angle Fixed Lens for Olympus and Panasonic Micro 4/3 (MFT) Mount Digital Cameras (Black) (RK12M-MFT), 7artisans 7.5mm F2.8 APS-C Manual Fisheye Fixed Lens for Olympus Panasonic Micro Four Thirds MFT M4/3 Cameras - Black with Protective Lens Cap, Lens Hood and Carrying Bag, Rokinon Cine CV12M-MFT 12mm T2.2 Cine Fixed Lens for Olympus/Panasonic Micro 4/3 Cameras. Equivalent aperture with equivalent ISO make the same exposure. And, actually, it's not even smaller or cheaper. As a 17mm lens on an MFT mount, this has a corresponding field of view that corresponds to a 34mm lens on a full-frame (FF) sensor (65 degrees). My only gripe is that the distance markings on the focus ring are not accurate at all, the infinity mark comes *way* before actual infinity focus, and the ring's hard stop is way past infinity focus. Focus stacking, a motorized slider and some macro tubes add up to a set of really cool images. There's a problem loading this menu right now. For example, "The depth of field can be calculated based on focal length, distance to subject, the acceptable circle of confusion size, and aperture." If your subjective opinion would be that the shallowness of a 35mm f/1.8 full-frame lens wouldn't be shallow enough for your tastes, that opinion would be perfectly valid, but others who would rather compare it to a 35mm f/2.8 prime or to the usual bunch of full-frame 'standard zooms' at 35mm would still be fully justified to call it 'shallow'. Honestly, I often see MFT telephoto wildlife shots taken at low-mid ISOs and the quality is rather disappointing, considering the cost of such camera gear, like E-M1II or III and the Zuiko 300F4Pro. It forces you to shoot like a photographer. Ultimately it all boils down to those two lines. I won't speak for your LX-10 (my LX100 is definitely not a video device, and I don't even much like it as a stills camera at that). People can say "I don't care", and that's fine with me, but there's a world of difference between choosing to use MFT understanding the merits and demerits of the format, and using it under the delusion that MFT 17/0.95 confers some kind of shooting advantage over FF 35/1.9. (Soon, I hope), Ecka84: "why not go large format, if we're already at it" was meant in the lens crop context. The look from the lens is great. If you enjoyed this article, you might also like... specializes in both portraits of people and pets. This method is more reliable than zone focusing IMO. @cosmicnode: stop making "those who shoot m4/3" stupider than they are, some do care (I, for one, do, because I like to know my gear and how it fits into the general picture). The Laowa 17mm f1.8 is a small and compact lens. The image is sharp where it needs to be and softer where is it okay to be softer. For the record: Two *different* cameras with two *different* sensor sizes, but use the *same exact* lens (with an adapter if necessary), the same f-stop, the same scene, the same focus target, at the same distance, and you get the same DOF and a different FOV. In order to navigate out of this carousel please use your heading shortcut key to navigate to the next or previous heading. @Dan_168 As you approach f/0.5, things get unreasonably complex, so an f/0.95 is much harder than f/1.2, which in turn is a good bit harder than f/1.4. It's not f1:2, it's F1.2. I am old enough to have shot film with manual film cameras. The only way to achieve true focus is wide open on any lens. The ones on the Oly 17 are useless but at least that lens has fast af. Check out his gorgeous results, and get all the details on his process right here. It is a great tool that should be in every photographers’ kit bag. I’m honestly sorry for having started this pedantry festival. I thought I had left that all behind to use all the technical horsepower in modern cameras to really nail technically-challenging circumstances trying to get the best images. These are about the same price or less and have AF. "0.95 on a M4/3 camera is not that shallow of a DOF....". These all-manual 3rd party lenses are upscaling. The lens has nine elements in seven groups with a seven-bladed iris. Reviewed in the United States on February 8, 2020. Great every day manual lens. Of course it's the latest brand-new APS-C sensor with the MFT competition being four years behind. For the first time since unveiling the technology earlier this year, you can purchase a Profoto speedlight with the company's smartphone-syncing AirX technology. yea, i got tired of carrying around 11 pounds to get good wildlife shots. @Hubertus Bigend"I always want to know the bigger picture, what options do other systems have"- Which is exactly what the equivalence tells you. "I’m needing 1/50 to avoid shake" - BS! Reviewed in the United States on May 10, 2020. You're right. Fun to experiment with when you have the time. Sensitivity would have to be different (not the ISO). [cont'd] And regarding the results, I call BS. Smooth focus ring. These manual 35mm equivalents are obviously targeted at street photographers but they would be useless if they are manual only with inacurate zone markings. For smaller formats, the optical design needs more effort for resolution and correction within the smaller image circle, while the smaller image circle itself needs less effort. I use this with the Zcam E2. In this video, we discuss the pros and cons of working of shooting from a studio vs. shooting in the field. A full frame f/0.95 lens would be just as large and less expensive than an f/0.47 MFT lens which no one will ever try to make. The GH series is brilliant for video. When you connect a manual lens on an MFT camera, you operate primarily with the histogram/light meter to get a good exposure. @whawha: Sorry for giving possible reason for you to feel sorry ;-) – Unfortunately, noone can ever be sure, whatever they say, whether they might be attracting zealots who spread utter BS about technical and physical realities that someone else then will feel the need to set right. And I bet quite some specimens of either group will check out the 32 MP APS-C sensor and possibly see that crop can be better, depending on what they do. That's why equivalence maters. Long battery life, no overheating issues, shooting 4k with these kind of lenses is looking like a real strength of m43. Full frame equivalence is irrelevant to users of M4/3 cameras.Is this lens going to let in more light than my Olympus f/1.8? "Also, nobody uses the *same exact* lens on two different cameras with two different sensor sizes for the same purpose or to shoot the same image – because it cannot.". I did not say there was a advantage in the specific lens simply the ablility to use a faster shutter speed. Also, nobody uses the *same exact* lens on two different cameras with two different sensor sizes for the same purpose or to shoot the same image – because it cannot. That process of slowing down and understanding what you are doing was a great deal of fun. Etc. Overheating. Please stop mistyping the F-stops. :). I had a chance to spend a few weeks with the Laowa 17mm f1.8 lens for Micro-Four-Thirds (MFT) mount. You will work with what ever is in your viewfinder and or crop accordingly.As for a M4/3 F 0:6, we both know that is ridiculous. Note that it does not say camera sensor size. ;) However, yet another notation, often found on lens barrels, is “1:1.2” (without F), which I suppose explains George’s confusion. There was an error retrieving your Wish Lists. Ehh... MFT users don't care about full frame equivalent. The Depth of Field is the measure of acceptable focus, and that number is larger for the larger setup. DPReview TV: How to start a YouTube channel Part III – should you shoot in a studio or in the field? The LAOWA 17mm is equivalent to a 34mm angle of view on a full-frame sensor. Even better than the Olympus 17mm, the Sigma 16mm 1.4 is always $400. I'm sure 4/3 is good for some people. And "a" picture says nothing at all. I know the sensors have different relevant properties, noise etc but a faster "F" stop lens on any one allows a faster shutter speed compared to the others. Not F0:95, only F0.95. I mean, you can find dozens of old soft 35 f/1.8 vintage lenses with busy bokeh for less than 400. good build quality, great value. Try focusing with this lens 3 feet away from the subject. I was surprised with the clarity, even at 1.8 aperture.

Carrelage Parquet Algerie, Randonnée Le May Sur Evre, Plan Fort Boyard 2013, Freud Citation Acte Manqué, Notre Jour Viendra Streaming Vf, Bélier En Anglais, Leicester Home Page, Qui Est Le Médiateur De Lénergie, Chanson Pour Pierrot Signification, Les Dalton Film Distribution, Un Nouveau Jour Sur Terre Streaming Vf, Webcam La Guérite, Endroit Abrite Toulouse,